Edison sex scandal continue, Carina Lau and Cherie Chung in the list

Wow..Edison may have been in another corner of the earth now but more news is coming.
It is said another suspect in the Edison sex scandal is Carina Lau and Cherie Chung. Both of them in their 40s are still charming , found their photos in Edison laptop is one of the stunning news if it prove a real one.

港媒爆艳照再涉两女星 网友猜测钟楚红刘嘉玲(图) 2008年03月01日 14:49 来源：百度娱乐 香港最新《忽然1周》封面 刊出的两位女星剪影 被网友怀疑为剪影原相的照片(刘嘉玲资料图) 　　百度娱乐讯 陈冠希公开道歉并宣布退出娱乐圈后，将电脑交由香港警方协助调查。警方发现艳照主角远多于先前已曝光的七人。近日，有消息传出，艳照门又涉及两位在圈中地 位很高、人脑很广的前辈女星。香港某杂志已爆出了疑似二人剪影，据网友猜测，刘嘉玲、钟楚红被疑为是剪影后的真身。 　　杂志爆料照片详情 　　该杂志爆料，有看过这两辑照片的人称：“‘车仔面’（化名）有两组相片。第一组有10张，是在酒店照的，她穿着see through（暴露的）内衣，和张柏芝那组有几分相似。至于另一批约有20张，应该是短片里面剪辑出来的，因为动作很连贯。” 　　至于另一女主角“无艇搭”（化名）的照片，该知情人士直指“很夸张”、“很刺激”：“这批相片其实也应该是短片，有十几张，地点也是在酒店房 间。这个女星已经年逾40岁，她表现得非常投入。老实讲，虽然她非常有名气，但Edison（陈冠希）怎么说都是后辈，真是饥不择食。” 　　网友猜测剪影真身、分析化名含义 　　此次被涉及的两位女星，一位被化名为“车仔面”的女星曾被誉为世上最美丽的女人，早年活跃于电影圈，并与多位巨星传过绯闻。另一位化名“无艇搭”的女星据说是一位年逾四十，出道超过20年的电影界天后级人物，不过近年已经逐渐转向商界发展。 　　据网友分析： 　　“车仔面”---钟记车仔面是香港最地道的一种面食,是50年代香港经济最低潮时兴起,一直到现在都还深得人心。钟楚红，早年美艳动人，曾与成龙传过绯闻。 　　“苏州过后无艇搭”广东俚语,没有明确出处,要说最早是来自做生意人中,体现了生意人争分夺秒，快买快卖的竞争心态。刘嘉玲，苏州人，出道已过20年，05年做过香港某电视频道的行政总裁，目前在上海也有经营酒吧。 　　更有好事者在挖掘剪影的原相，刘嘉玲出席某活动的一张照片即受到重点怀疑。 坏坏/文

Michael Backman, Malaysia need a strong opposition!

This is what I quote from Michael Backman's blog. Think again and use your vote wisely. An Australian may have a better insights of Malaysia current politics condition than others.

Malaysia needs a strong Opposition
by Michael Backman
The Age
February 27, 2008

SHOULD Malaysians bother to vote? The corollary of this question is: does the Malaysian Government deserve to
be re-elected? The answer to the second question is no.

In the past few years, the Malaysian Government has presided over an extraordinary number of scandals that are
appalling by any standards: the trade minister's allocation of car import permits to friends, relatives and supporters;
the billion-dollar fraud at the Port Klang Free Trade Zone; the outrageous and much-flaunted wealth of ruling party
politician Zakaria Md Deros; the claims that a High Court judge allowed the lawyer representing a rich businessman
to write for him his judgement in a defamation lawsuit; an immensely rich chief minister in Sarawak state who is
allowed to rule as if it were his; and so on.

The Malaysian Government richly deserves to pay for all of this at the ballot box.

So the next question is: should the Malaysian Opposition be elected to office? Again, the answer is no.

The Opposition is a shambolic assortment of the disaffected rather than a competent, alternative government. In
no way is it ready to govern.

All these questions are pertinent because Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi has called elections for March 8.

Elections are fought tenaciously in Malaysia as if the South-East Asian country is a fully fledged democracy. But it
isn't. It is democratic in that elections are held, but they are not fair. The ruling coalition has been in power in one
form or another since independence 50 years ago. One reason for this longevity is that there are legal and
institutional biases that favour the Government.

Malaysian electorates are severely malapportioned. The smallest electorates are rural; the largest are
metropolitan. The largest have about six times the number of registered voters as the smallest. This means that
the votes of those in the smallest seats count for many times those in the larger seats.

This sort of bias meant, for example, that in the last general elections held in 2004, the ruling coalition won 198 or
91% of the parliamentary seats with just 64% of the votes cast. The Opposition won only 21 seats or 9.6% of the
seats compared with 36% of the popular vote.

Had the Parliament reflected voters' actual voting intentions, there would have been 79 rather than 21 Opposition
members elected.

Outright fraud is another way in which Malaysians are cheated when they vote. Tens of thousands of dead people
are believed to have voted in the 2004 elections. Exit polling is difficult, but it is assumed that these voters
overwhelmingly favoured the Government. Credit must be given when it is due — the Government did eventually
remove hundreds of thousands of deceased voters from the electoral roles. But the damage had been done.

Also at the last elections, thousands of Malaysians who turned up on polling day found that the electorates in which
they were registered had been changed without their permission or knowledge. Thousands of voters were shifted
into Opposition-held or marginal electorates. Absurdly, even family members living in the same house discovered
that they had been registered in different electorates. Most Malaysians do vote for the ruling coalition, so the effect
of this was to swamp the votes for the Opposition.

Multiple voting is another problem. Indelible ink is used to mark voters when they vote, but it is not compulsory.

Next month's election is being held a year early. Why? One reason is because Anwar Ibrahim, who was deputy
prime minister until he was charged and convicted of corruption and sodomy in the late 1990s, will only be eligible
to stand for election after April 8 because of the convictions. The sodomy convictions were overturned because of
uncertainty about the dates on which the alleged acts were supposed to have occurred, but the corruption verdict
stood.

Anwar is unfit to hold public office, regardless of the Government's manoeuvring against him. The sodomy issue is
irrelevant. The serious charges against him are the corruption charges, which relate to Anwar asking the police to
heavy two witnesses into withdrawing their statements against him. On this, Anwar was convicted with irrefutable
evidence.

That the deputy prime minister of any country should do such a thing is unforgivable and yet Anwar has his
backers, mostly in the Western media.

Most Malaysians found his criticisms of their Government shortly after he was removed from office to be
transparently opportunistic, given that he had been a senior minister in the Government for 15 years. But while
Anwar is more popular outside Malaysia than inside, he is still a rallying figure for the discontented.

So what should Malaysians do? Firstly, in a country where voting is not compulsory, they should vote. There's no
point complaining on internet blogs but not bothering to vote.

Given the Opposition's unpreparedness to govern, the Malaysian Government is best returned. But it does
deserve a good, hard kick. Even more, it needs a significant and strong Opposition to help it govern better. It
needs greater accountability and scrutiny, which a strong Opposition in Parliament will help provide. That is what
good governments everywhere have and need.

Of course, tiny Singapore is an exception but Singapore is a country in name only. The reality is that the Singapore
Government is a glorified city council.

Malaysia, on the other hand, is a diverse and complex country that wants to be modern. It needs to be governed
like one.

ends